|Joined: ||Wed Dec 14th, 2011|
|Location: || |
As someone who owns (and really likes) the original version and typically doesn't buy multiple editions of decks, I would buy a new edition of the Savage if the printing were more representative of the images as presented on the web site. I remember, back when I got the deck, going through the cards and comparing them to the web images and realizing there were details and textures visible on the web that were just not readily visible on the cards. (On the other hand, I love the incredible subtlety of the barely visible title on the backs of the cards.)
I've always been disappointed in the image vibrancy myself. (The title was meant to be incredibly subtle.) It's those little details that were most often important to me. I know what happened there and worked to fix it, but what was produced was the best possible outcome, given what I had. I do know that press printing has come a long way in the last six years, which is another reason why I'm considering a reprint.
Thank you so much for your feedback!